Friday, June 27, 2014

PPACA Update: Highlights of the PCORI Fee

By Bill Olson


The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) fee is due July 31, 2014, for virtually all group medical plans.

Who is responsible for this fee?

The carrier is responsible for paying the fee on insured policies, and the employer/plan sponsor is responsible for paying the fee on self-funded plans [including Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs)]. IRS Form 720 is used to report and pay the fee.

What is PCORI? 

Click here to continue reading.

Thursday, June 26, 2014

Costly manager mistake firms make 82% of the time

By Jared Bilski


Based on all of the FMLA and ADA lawsuits that are caused by manager mistakes, HR and benefits pros know how important it is to pick the right person to head up each and every company department.

But it looks like a staggering number of employers are failing to do just that.

Click here to continue reading.

Wednesday, June 25, 2014

9 critical questions for any FMLA administrator

By Jared Bilski


An increasing number of companies have outsourced their Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) processes to a third-party administrator (TPA). But many of these firms falsely believe that should things go awry, their TPA will take care of it.

Unfortunately, that misconception couldn’t be further from the truth. Much like COBRA administration, even if you do pay a TPA to handle all of your FMLA administration processes, your company will likely be on the hook if that TPA fails to comply with all of its legal FMLA responsibilities.

Click here to continue reading.

Tuesday, June 24, 2014

Tip Tuesday! Final Regulations Released on 30-day Orientation Period

By Larry Grudzien Attorney-At-Law


On June 20, 2014, the Departments of Labor (DOL), Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Treasury (the Departments) released new final regulations on application of the 30-day orientation period under the 90-day waiting period limit.  On February 20, 2014, the Departments had published proposed regulations to address orientation periods under the 90-day waiting period limitation of PHS Act section 2708 when the final regulations on the 90-day waiting period were published.  The following summarizes the provisions of these final regulations. The final regulations contain several clarifications.

The Proposed Regulations

The proposed regulations had provided that one month would be the maximum allowed length of any reasonable and bona fide employment-based orientation period. The Departments stated that, during an orientation period, they envisioned that an employer and employee could evaluate whether the employment situation was satisfactory for each party, and standard orientation and training processes would begin. Under the proposed regulations, if a group health plan conditions eligibility on an employee's having completed a reasonable and bona fide employment-based orientation period, the eligibility condition would not be considered to be designed to avoid compliance with the 90-day waiting period limitation if the orientation period did not exceed one month and the maximum 90-day waiting period would begin on the first day after the orientation period.

The Final Regulations

The final regulations continue to provide that one month is the maximum allowed length of an employment-based orientation period. For any period longer than one month that precedes a waiting period, the Departments refer back to the general rule, which provides that the 90-day period begins after an individual is otherwise eligible to enroll under the terms of a group health plan. While a plan may impose substantive eligibility criteria, such as requiring the worker to fit within an eligible job classification or to achieve job-related licensure requirements, it may not impose conditions that are mere subterfuges for the passage of time.

These final regulations provide that the one month period would be determined by adding one calendar month and subtracting one calendar day, measured from an employee's start date in a position that is otherwise eligible for coverage. For example, if an employee's start date in an otherwise eligible position is May 3, the last permitted day of the orientation period is June 2.  Similarly, if an employee's start date in an otherwise eligible position is October 1, the last permitted day of the orientation period is October 31. 

If there is not a corresponding date in the next calendar month upon adding a calendar month, the last permitted day of the orientation period is the last day of the next calendar month. For example, if the employee's start date is January 30, the last permitted day of the orientation period is February 28 (or February 29 in a leap year). Similarly, if the employee's start date is August 31, the last permitted day of the orientation period is September 30.

The final regulations continue to provide that if a group health plan conditions eligibility on an employee's having completed a reasonable and bona fide employment-based orientation period, the eligibility condition is not considered to be designed to avoid compliance with the 90-day waiting period limitation if the orientation period does not exceed one month and the maximum 90-day waiting period begins on the first day after the orientation period.

But compliance with these final regulations is not determinative of compliance with Section 4980H of the Code (employer mandate), under which an applicable large employer may be subject to an assessable payment if it fails to offer affordable minimum value coverage to certain newly-hired full-time employees by the first day of the fourth full calendar month of employment.

For example, an applicable large employer that has a one-month orientation period may comply with both PHS Act section 2708 and Code section 4980H by offering coverage no later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month of employment. However, an applicable large employer plan may not be able to impose the full one-month orientation period and the full 90-day waiting period without potentially becoming subject to an assessable payment under Code section 4980H. 

For example, if an employee is hired as a full-time employee on January 6, a plan may offer coverage May 1 and comply with both provisions. However, if the employer is an applicable large employer and starts coverage May 6, which is one month plus 90 days after date of hire, the employer may be subject to an assessable payment under Code section 4980H.

Effective Date


These final regulations apply to group health plans and health insurance issuers for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2015.  Until these final rules are applicable, as stated in the preamble to the proposed rules, the Departments will consider compliance with the proposed regulations to constitute compliance with PHS Act section 2708.

Read more from Larry here.

Friday, June 20, 2014

2 ways ACA enrollment extension helps employers

By Jared Bilski



When the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) decided to extend the first open enrollment period of the Affordable Care Act marketplace, its intention was to help laid-off workers. But the move has significant benefits for employers as well.

Click here to continue reading.

Thursday, June 19, 2014

The 3 most crucial elements of any wellness programs

By Jared Bilski


While the specifics of the program will vary from company to company, new research finds the overall success of a wellness program depends on these three elements.

Click here to continue reading.

Wednesday, June 18, 2014

5 secrets to weeding out bad candidates using social media

By Christian Schappel


Sure, you’re looking for the right mix of skills and experience in a candidate, but you’re also looking for the “right fit.” In other words, you want someone who’ll blend seamlessly into your company culture. Problem is, a resume and interview can’t always answer the “fit” question. 

Social media can get you a lot closer. It can provide employers with an all-important window into a candidate’s true identity.

Click here to continue reading.

Tuesday, June 17, 2014

Tip Tuesday! How Benefits Communication Boosts the Bottom Line

By Bill Olson


As the cost of employer-sponsored health insurance continues to rapidly outpace wages and inflation, now more than ever employers are looking for ways to keep costs down. One way to do so (that requires very modest investment) is by improving benefits communication, a critical component of employee engagement.

Click here for entire article.

Friday, June 13, 2014

Your summer-fun bucket list: Feel like a kid again

By United Healthcare

Rediscover your summertime joy with this delightful to-do list



When you were a kid, weren't the dreamy days of summer the best? You had time to play, explore and relax.

How about recapturing some of that youthful joy before another summer flies by? In the weeks to come, sprinkle your schedule with a few fun and feel-good activities. Here are ideas you might put on your own personal list — or enjoy with the whole family:

Tour a local treasure. Plan an outing to a historic spot in your area. Visit Recreation.gov for ideas.

Click here to continue reading.




Thursday, June 12, 2014

12 ways to give your days a berry boost

By Melanie Pol, M.M.Sc., R.D.N., F.A.D.A.


At last! Berry season is here — and boy, is it sweet!

Lush red strawberries grown in your own backyard. Plump blueberries fresh from the farmers market or grocery store. Sun-ripened blackberries plucked from a hillside. However you pick them, berries are splendid jewels of summer.

Click here to continue reading.

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

IRS reveals massive $36,500 per employee health reform penalty

By Christian Schappel


Introducing the worst monetary penalty — on a per employee basis — an employer can subject itself to under healthcare reform. 

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) does not want employers thinking they can send employees to a health insurance exchange or the open insurance market with a tax-free contribution to help them pay premiums.

Click here to continue reading.

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Tip Tuesday! The 3 top causes of DOL audits — and you can control just 2 of them

By Tim Gould


Few things strike fear in employers’ hearts like a DOL audit. After all, most of the feds’ investigations result in firms shelling out serious cash in fines or settlements or both.  


But understanding the major reasons the feds come knocking in the first place — and working diligently to avoid making mistakes in those areas — is one of the best ways to avoid an audit.

Click here to continue reading.

Friday, June 6, 2014

Study highlights managers’ flexible scheduling bias

By Jared Bilski


Ideally, flexible scheduling allows employees to set their hours in a way that makes them as effective as possible. But many managers believe workers with a specific flexible schedule are much more efficient than their peers.

Tuesday, June 3, 2014

Tip Tuesday! I.R.S. Bars Employers From Dumping Workers Into Health Exchanges

By Robert Pear

WASHINGTON — Many employers had thought they could shift health costs to the government by sending their employees to a health insurance exchange with a tax-free contribution of cash to help pay premiums, but the Obama administration has squelched the idea in a new ruling. Such arrangements do not satisfy the health care law, the administration said, and employers may be subject to a tax penalty of $100 a day — or $36,500 a year — for each employee who goes into the individual marketplace.

The ruling this month, by the Internal Revenue Service, blocks any wholesale move by employers to dump employees into the exchanges.

Click here to continue reading.